(2023-09-23, 03:59 PM)Lục Tuyết Kỳ Wrote: Kỳ rinh sang đây để trả lời nàng cho tiện hỉ.  


Haley and Scott, both devoted advocates for our nation, contribute immensely to our country.  Yet, they could benefit from Trump's unique energy and charisma.  His unapologetic approach and broad appeal have left a lasting mark.  Combining their strengths with Trump's dynamism could form a powerhouse team that could lead our nation toward an even brighter future.  

Answers to your questions:

1.  Yes, Trump's slogan "Make America Great Again" still holds weight.  He's proven he can get the job done, and his track record speaks volumes; we had a great 4 years while he was in office.  However, it's also worth considering that he's had his term, and we experienced four years of substantial progress.  Now, given the current state of affairs, and the challenges that have arisen in the past three years, particularly the destruction that uncle Joe and his administration have maneuvered, perhaps we need a slogan that aligns even better with our present circumstances.  It's about adapting and evolving, don't you think?  

2.  I must admit, there were moments during the last election that raised eyebrows.  Instances of unverified ballots mysteriously appearing in counting boxes and reports of voting machine irregularities did give pause for thought.  The democrats' vigorous push for mail-in ballots without stringent ID requirements was, to say the least, a subject of scrutiny.

While my faith in the democratic process remains, I do harbor reservations about certain aspects of its execution.  It's a matter of trust, yet tempered with the need for diligent oversight and transparency.  Let's just say I've got a side-eye saved up for some of the folks running the show.  Trust but verify, right?  

3.  I agree.  

When evaluating a candidate for a job position, I believe it's important to assess their ability to effectively carry out their duties. Personal likability or social compatibility should not overshadow this crucial criterion.  In my view, Trump, regardless of personal opinions or feelings, has demonstrated an ability to get the job done.  While his immigration plans may seem rigid, they align with his vision for the nation.  Ultimately, I believe it's about choosing the candidate who can best fulfill the responsibilities of the position.  

I admire a leader who stands with his head held high, honoring the FLAG with his right hand on his heart, and sings proudly the Star-Spangled.  We need a leader who champions righteousness, fights for just laws, advances intelligence to conquer diseases, pioneers interplanetary habitation, and ensures our children are well-nurtured and educated, cultivates their God's gifted talents.  This leader should also establish rules for schools to refrain from advocating political agendas like gender neutrality.  

Values of responsibility and integrity shall flow through every vein of our education system, instills in every choice they make, echoing Kennedy's timeless call:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

Let schools be sanctuaries free from ideological biases, where a well-rounded education forges a generation equipped to conquer the trials of tomorrow.  

Very well said, nàng! 

After skimming the proposals from Republican and Democratic presidential candidates, I provisory agree that Mr. Trump is the best choice to elect for now. Mr. Trump should've been proud of you as one of his solid supporters, and thanks for your vivid compliments. I hope the voters can help America by blowing away the dark clouds to see and enjoy the sunrise.

Mr. Trump might be a good leader despite his attitude. If he knew how to balance it, the Americans would appreciate it. Do you believe that God created an existence with two faces, bright on one side and clumsy on the other?

(2023-09-24, 07:49 PM)TiểuHồLy Wrote: Sao ngộ dzậy cà? THL nghĩ tiếng Việt của mình cũng không tệ mà ta? Sao kỳ này hiểu trớt quớt lời nàng Tuyết Kỳ viết dạ chời. 

Người đọc hiểu sai ý người viết là do lối viết của người viết kg rõ ràng, dẫn đến hiểu lầm và ngộ nhận.

My apology. 😁

ABC Poll: Trump Leads Biden by 10, Pollsters Can't Believe It

TRUMP LEADS BIDEN: Former President Trump drew a majority 52% support among registered voters in a hypothetical head-to-head matchup versus President Biden, according to a new poll.

Of course, ABC conducted the poll but did not like the results.  So hang on, prepare to witness them cheat, they will do whatever it takes to not let Trump win the election.   

https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents...e_manual_4

Trump leads Biden by 20 points among voters age 35 and younger.

Even a majority of Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents do not want Biden to run for reelection as 62% want someone else as the Democrat nominee.

Trump, though, dominates the GOP presidential primary field among registered Republicans and GOP-leaning independents:

Trump 54%
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis 15%
Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley 7%
Former Vice President Mike Pence 6%
Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., 4%
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie 3%
Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy 3%
North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson each received less than 1% support, while 6% selected "other" and 4% picked "no opinion."

While Trump continues to rise since May, DeSantis has fallen from his 25% in that month, when he first announced his 2024 presidential campaign.

Other notable findings in the poll results:

Just 15% of U.S. adults say they are better off under Biden.
Near three times as many (44%) say they are worse off under Biden.
Just 37% of adults approve of the job Biden has done, while a majority 56% disapprove.
Under "Bidenomics," just 30% approve of Biden's handling of the economy, a low point for his presidency.
Around 75% of Americans say the economy is not so good or poor, including 57% giving it a negative grade.
Biden gets a 87% not so good or poor on gas and energy prices.
Biden gets a 91% not so good or poor on food prices.
Biden gets 23% approval, 62% disapproval on the handling of the border.
Trump's retroactive approval ratings in the poll are "10 points better than when he left office in January 2021 and higher than it was through nearly the entirety of his presidency," according to the Post.

Trump is more than doubling up Biden among voters who did not vote in 2020, which amounted to 15% of the sampled registered voters. Trump led those by a wide margin 63%-27%. Trump leads Biden by 5 points (50%-45%) among those who say they did vote in 2020.

But, still, the Post went on to explain how its own poll results are an "outlier," even while admitting the sample's 2020 vote closely reflected the results of the past presidential election and not acknowledging why the electorate might be turning back to Trump.

"Outlier results occasionally occur in polls due to random error and nonresponse issues, although the political composition of the poll is typical on other metrics," the Post wrote. "Self-reported 2020 voters say they supported Biden over Trump that year by a 50% to 46% margin, similar to Biden's 51% to 47% margin in the national popular vote."

The Washington Post-ABC News poll was conducted Sept. 15-20 among 1,006 U.S. adults, 890 registered voters, 396 leaned Democrats, and 474 leaned Republicans. The overall results have a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points, plus or minus 6 percentage points for Democrats and plus or minus 5.5 percentage points for Republicans.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/poll-do...tid=Zxz2cZ

(2023-09-24, 07:53 PM)TiểuHồLy Wrote: Very well said, nàng! 

After skimming the proposals from Republican and Democratic presidential candidates, I provisory agree that Mr. Trump is the best choice to elect for now. Mr. Trump should've been proud of you as one of his solid supporters, and thanks for your vivid compliments. I hope the voters can help America by blowing away the dark clouds to see and enjoy the sunrise.

Mr. Trump might be a good leader despite his attitude. If he knew how to balance it, the Americans would appreciate it. Do you believe that God created an existence with two faces, bright on one side and clumsy on the other?

Well, it may come across that way, but I never had a personal fondness for him.     

Still, I've got to admit, it's undeniable that he was an exceptional American president.  Like I said, when considering a candidate for a job, it's crucial not to let personal feelings toward a person sway the decision.  

I believe everyone has different sides to them, a mosaic of experiences, beliefs, and emotions.  We show different parts of ourselves depending on the situation.  Whether it's in our roles as parents, professionals, or friends, each one illuminates a different aspect of our character.

And then there are outside influences like our background and what we hope to achieve, which add even more layers, more complexity.  

As my husband aptly put it, the human race is truly captivating in its multifaceted nature.  

PS.  As for Trump, we need his unapologetic side to instigate necessary changes.  The other good guys are too nice, often too polite; they might not stand a chance against the bullies.   

Hahaha... a classic example.  


This video shows you that if you mistreat someone, it can come back on you very quickly.  

Biden supporter v. Trump Group


https://www.facebook.com/WayneDupreeShow...7355575123

We knew it all along, "the same rules and laws don't apply when you're a democrat."    
...

Menendez stands firm amid calls to resign, suddenly recalls due process: ‘Innocent until proven guilty’     

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-bob-...=103463381

U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), after hiring Hunter Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell on Friday, has suddenly had an epiphany and remembers due process, declaring he’s innocent till proven guilty.

Menendez then claimed that hundreds of thousands of dollars found at his home in a safe deposit box, envelopes with his name on them, and stuffed in suit pockets were withdrawn from his personal savings account.

While the same Hunter Biden is suing the IRS for tax disclosure, following agent testimony before Congress. It's curious how they can pursue Trump relentlessly for his tax returns, yet a different set of rules seems to apply.  

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-...9be6464c76
...

The audacity of it all!

Menendez, under fire, suddenly remembers the concept of "innocent until proven guilty."  Yet, when it came to Trump, they were ready to pass judgment faster than a speeding bullet - no trials, no convictions, just swift conclusions.  It's a stark reminder of how the rules seem to shift depending on who's in the hot seat.  It's not just concerning, it's a downright spectacle.  We ought to demand the same level of fairness for everyone, no matter which side of the aisle they're on.  This kind of inconsistency is enough to make you roll your eyes and question the whole system.  Our institutions cannot be trusted. Time for a reality check,  American people!   

(2023-09-25, 10:47 AM)Lục Tuyết Kỳ Wrote:

Well, it may come across that way, but I never had a personal fondness for him.     

Still, I've got to admit, it's undeniable that he was an exceptional American president.  Like I said, when considering a candidate for a job, it's crucial not to let personal feelings toward a person sway the decision.  

I believe everyone has different sides to them, a mosaic of experiences, beliefs, and emotions.  We show different parts of ourselves depending on the situation.  Whether it's in our roles as parents, professionals, or friends, each one illuminates a different aspect of our character.

And then there are outside influences like our background and what we hope to achieve, which add even more layers, more complexity.  

As my husband aptly put it, the human race is truly captivating in its multifaceted nature.  

PS.  As for Trump, we need his unapologetic side to instigate necessary changes.  The other good guys are too nice, often too polite; they might not stand a chance against the bullies.   

Your philosophy is seemingly right to me. It's very precious that your husband has a profound outlook on life.  

Hey nàng, 
Are you interested in further discussion on Mr. Trump's plans? One of them is to end the war between Russia & Ukraine in one day. As an intelligent voter, what do you think and predict of this plan?

BTW, I definitely like this praise from Ms. Haley in her new speech, "He was strong on foreign policy in getting America's respect in the world".

(2023-09-25, 06:03 AM)Lục Tuyết Kỳ Wrote: Người đọc hiểu sai ý người viết là do lối viết của người viết kg rõ ràng, dẫn đến hiểu lầm và ngộ nhận.

My apology. 😁

Your apology is accepted. 

(2023-09-25, 10:18 PM)TiểuHồLy Wrote: Your philosophy is seemingly right to me. It's very precious that your husband has a profound outlook on life.  

Hey nàng, 
Are you interested in further discussion on Mr. Trump's plans? One of them is to end the war between Russia & Ukraine in one day. As an intelligent voter, what do you think and predict of this plan?

BTW, I definitely like this praise from Ms. Haley in her new speech, "He was strong on foreign policy in getting America's respect in the world".

Well... guess it's my luck to be married to a brainy Brit scholar.  I've basically got a walking, talking library on legs!  Hit the jackpot of brain-picking privileges!  

Sure, of course.  Shoot your thoughts, and we'll discuss, just for fun.  Jay's got this awesome knack for critical thinking.  We can have some fun dissecting Trump's plan to end the Ukraine nightmare.

Yes, absolutely, and she is right.  One thing the anti-Trump peeps fail to admit, and they never will admit it, is that there was no war, and no threats while Trump was in office.  The only threats that existed were from the democratic politicians themselves and the biased msm.  It doesn't matter how he did it, but he did, and we had peace!  

Hahaha... here we go again.  The old witch at work...  

“Cruella Pelosi De Vil” the Queen of Impeachment over her opinion & hatred of President Trump now comes yakking.



Pelosi slams Biden impeachment inquiry: ‘If you have a difference of opinion, you just can't be impeaching’

Pelosi has joined Democratic lawmakers in calling the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden's involvement in alleged foreign money laundering and bribery schemes a "fake distraction" from the looming government shutdown deadline. 

But it's ok for her to call for Trump's impeachment.  

Pelosi says House will impeach Trump, pushes VP to oust him

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-...5c3a32f640

Thank you Mayor Johnson.  A brave man!! 😍   Dallas city là thành trì của đảng dân chủ và bọn phá hoại ở N. Texas. 
....
Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson announced on Friday that he is leaving the Democrat Party and becoming a Republican.

“Today I am changing my party affiliation,” Johnson wrote in an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on Friday. “Next spring, I will be voting in the Republican primary. When my career in elected office ends in 2027 on the inauguration of my successor as mayor, I will leave office as a Republican.”

Johnson said the “future of America’s great urban centers depends on the willingness of the nation’s mayors to champion law and order and practice fiscal conservatism,” adding that American cities “desperately need the genuine commitment to these principles (as opposed to the inconsistent, poll-driven commitment of many Democrats) that has long been a defining characteristic of the GOP.”

“Most of these local leaders are proud Democrats who view cities as laboratories for liberalism rather than as havens for opportunity and free enterprise,” Johnson wrote.

“Too often, local tax dollars are spent on policies that exacerbate homelessness, coddle criminals and make it harder for ordinary people to make a living,” he continued. “And too many local Democrats insist on virtue signaling—proposing half-baked government programs that aim to solve every single societal ill—and on finding new ways to thumb their noses at Republicans at the state or federal level.”

https://americanmilitarynews.com/2023/09...2SYf1sc1v0

This just happened in Dallas city.

(2023-09-25, 11:52 PM)Lục Tuyết Kỳ Wrote: Well... guess it's my luck to be married to a brainy Brit scholar.  I've basically got a walking, talking library on legs!  Hit the jackpot of brain-picking privileges!  

Sure, of course.  Shoot your thoughts, and we'll discuss, just for fun.  Jay's got this awesome knack for critical thinking.  We can have some fun dissecting Trump's plan to end the Ukraine nightmare.

Yes, absolutely, and she is right.  One thing the anti-Trump peeps fail to admit, and they never will admit it, is that there was no war, and no threats while Trump was in office.  The only threats that existed were from the democratic politicians themselves and the biased msm.  It doesn't matter how he did it, but he did, and we had peace!  

Oh, I didn't know he was a British scholar. He wasn't the same gentleman at Catalina Island, right? For privacy considerations, you could avoid answering, it's understandable. Congrats on your marriage. 

Ok, I'll shoot my thoughts first. 

I'm speculating that Mr. Trump might use his executive power as president by ceasing or decreasing the military, ammunition, and economic aid to Ukraine; reducing international sanctions that are throttling the Russian economy; allowing Ukraine to join NATO; Russia keeps 1/2 of Crimea which has the naval base at Sevastopol; Ukraine should be guaranteed water supplies to Crimea and the other half which has the world's exchange of food chain. The main point to stress here is whether it is acceptable for the agreements that precipitated peace from all parties or not.

(2023-09-26, 01:44 PM)TiểuHồLy Wrote: Oh, I didn't know he was a British scholar. He wasn't the same gentleman at Catalina Island, right? For privacy considerations, you could avoid answering, it's understandable. Congrats on your marriage. 

Ok, I'll shoot my thoughts first. 

I'm speculating that Mr. Trump might use his executive power as president by ceasing or decreasing the military, ammunition, and economic aid to Ukraine; reducing international sanctions that are throttling the Russian economy; allowing Ukraine to join NATO; Russia keeps 1/2 of Crimea which has the naval base at Sevastopol; Ukraine should be guaranteed water supplies to Crimea and the other half which has the world's exchange of food chain. The main point to stress here is whether it is acceptable for the agreements that precipitated peace from all parties or not.

Thank you. 

No worries, it's fine.  Nope, not the same.    CI's ended due to irreconcilable differences shortly after it began.  It was the right decision for both, so I decided to pull the plug and walked away.  

To be honest, I'm not privy to all the intricate details of his plan.  He's playing his cards close to the chest, probably to prevent any leaks or idea-snatching by the media and uncle Joe.  Hahaha...

What I can say is, he's inclined to strike a deal that would significantly improve Ukraine's current situation. Plus, he won't hesitate to put pressure on Poo-tin.  As I've noted earlier, Trump possesses a unique force that sets him apart from other candidates and politicians, making his stance against Poo-tin particularly potent and incredibly effective.  

Well, here's a juicy nugget: NYC is all set to drop an extra billion bucks on hotels just to house migrants for another three years. 

Here's a thought - why not ship them straight to the doorsteps of those who are singing the open-border tune?  Problem solved!  It's high time we put our resources where our mouth is, isn't it?  Let's see if this sassy strategy shakes things up a bit!     

I didn't pay my taxes for this... 
...

https://nypost.com/2023/09/25/nyc-now-pr...ore-years/

New York City is preparing for the worst — extending its contract with local hotels to help house migrants for up to three more years at a staggering added cost of more than $1 billion.

And the revised contract’s projected new total $1.365 billion price tag — nearly five times what the original deal called for — would just pay the rental fees to more than 100 hotels converted into emergency migrant shelters.

It doesn’t include the cost of city facilities and other rented sites housing homeless asylum seekers pouring into the Big Apple by the thousands every week.

Critics — including even some Democrats — raged that the Adams administration’s contract with the New York City Hotel Assocation, which is set to be extended from this year through August 2026, reeked of a taxpayer giveaway. 

“Why are we extending this contract for three years? It sends the message of not wanting to reduce this migrant population,” said Nicole Gelinas, a senior fellow with The Manhattan Institute.

Gelinas said the city created “one big monopoly” by giving the hotel industry an overarching contract without competing bids that could lower costs.

Democratic Queens Councilman Robert Holden seethed, “The migrant crisis has evolved into a financial boondoggle, with quietly extended contracts fattening the pockets of a few at the taxpayer’s expense.

“It’s time to halt this fiscal recklessness. Let’s send those [migrant] buses to the White House and remember that ‘Right to Shelter’ shouldn’t be misconstrued as a global entitlement,” he said, referring to New York City’s law guaranteeing shelter to the homeless, including asylum seekers. 

A spokeswoman with the city Department Department of Social Services/Homeless Services told The Post on Monday, “For over a year now, the city has worked to address this humanitarian crisis with an all of government approach, and with thousands of asylum seekers arriving each week, we are constantly reassessing our needs.

“This proposal for contract extension is designed to provide capacity as needed, but it also provides the flexibility to scale back or terminate if circumstances on the ground change.”

It was unclear Monday if the fat hotel contract is part of the estimated total $12 billion that Mayor Eric Adams has said the migrant crisis could cost the city over three years — absent additional financial aid from Washington and Albany.

(2023-09-26, 02:56 PM)Lục Tuyết Kỳ Wrote: Thank you. 

No worries, it's fine.  Nope, not the same.    CI's ended due to irreconcilable differences shortly after it began.  It was the right decision for both, so I decided to pull the plug and walked away.  

To be honest, I'm not privy to all the intricate details of his plan.  He's playing his cards close to the chest, probably to prevent any leaks or idea-snatching by the media and uncle Joe.  Hahaha...

What I can say is, he's inclined to strike a deal that would significantly improve Ukraine's current situation. Plus, he won't hesitate to put pressure on Poo-tin.  As I've noted earlier, Trump possesses a unique force that sets him apart from other candidates and politicians, making his stance against Poo-tin particularly potent and incredibly effective.  

Thank you. You're so lucky in your love life. I am a bit envious. 

Mr. Trump was embodied by a unique, wild personality. As a successful businessman, most goods he trades must have profits. Just wait and see. 
Mr. Trump for 2024...go....go...go...Republican. 

PS: Does anyone have a rocket ready to fire at me, yet? 

A sòfter side of Trump, flipping burgers for the common people.  I know he can get "nasty" to certain MSM individuals due to their holier-than-thou attitude,  in my opinion, they deserve every bit of it.